It’s over. Finally.

Well, we’re finally done with the WASL. You know- the big “high-stakes test” that all Washington state 3rd through 11th grade students must take. The one that 10th and 11th graders need in order to graduate. That’s right, in order to have the “in” diploma, student must pass this exam. You know, the WASL- Washington Assessment of Student Learning.
I could go on and on and on about this “fun” test and the experience of administrating it to my special education students… but instead, I’ll just highlight a few of my thoughts/questions with the great WASL exam.
- Is having a student work on this exam from 9:30am to 3:30pm really an appropriate measure of their writing abilities? Is this a productive day for this child?
- Are teachers “teaching to the test” when they begin practicing WASL-like questions with their students in February? Is this a good thing? Is this a bad thing?
- Is this really an assessment of the students? Or of the teachers? Or is it about our society?
- Is this test “better” than others since it contains short and extended response questions along with the few multiple choice questions?
I do understand the extreme importance of assessing all students equally and in a fair manner, that it is important to track progress, and assessments help to plan instruction but… is a high-stake test like the WASL the answer?
None-the-less, after much preparation, planning, and practice using the Big6 and Super3, my students tackled the test and did the best they could- with confidence and a positive attitude!! The Big6 and Super3 are information problem-solving processes that can be applied to any task or assignment or yes, even a test. I just wonder if there isn’t a middle ground that would better meet students needs and accomplish fair assessment.


